Back in May, Pete Thamel of the New York Times penned an article claiming that Eric Bledsoe received improper benefits during his high school days, and also made accusations of academic impropriety.
While Thamel's article seemed to do nothing more than spawn an investigation, a report today from the Birmingham News seems, on the surface, to be quite damning.
You can read the article from Jon Solomon in full here (and I strongly suggest you do), but there are two key components to take note of.
- Bledsoe's transcript says that he received a 90 in Algebra 3 during two night school sessions. But a grade report from those two sessions indicates that Bledsoe actually received a low C and a low B in those classes.
- The other issue is that Bledsoe seemingly took these classes out of order. He took Alegbra 3 during the first semester of his senior year, while taking Algebra 2 in the second semester. He got an A in both classes. As the article indicates, Bledsoe would have fallen short of the NCAA's criteria for eligibility if he had received anything less than an A in either class. Bledsoe had never received a grade higher than a C in math before enrolling at Parker High for his senior year.
- Another issue to take note of is that Bledsoe received just one grade higher than a C in his core classes before enrolling at Parker, and that was a B he received as a make-up grade during a summer school session. After enrolling at Parker, seven of the ten grades he received in core classes (the ones that matter to the NCAA) were an A or a B.
But with all the other information out there -- including grades that seem to have actually been changed -- this report is going to draw a lot of interest from the NCAA.
As we learned from the Derrick Rose fiasco, the NCAA has the right to, if they wish, retroactively make a player ineligible. The NCAA has a staff of 55 people to examine some 90,000 potentially ineligible transcripts. Their view is that it is on the school to do a more thorough investigation into an athlete's eligibility.
If Bledsoe did lie on his transcripts, if the NCAA decides that Bledsoe earned a C in Algebra 3 instead of an A, then they could very well rule him ineligible. (Although this case does resemble the one involving Kansas' Darrell Arthur.)That would mean that Kentucky would, in all likelihood, have to vacate every one of the wins that Bledsoe played, which just so happens to be every game Kentucky won last season with the exception of a 104-61 drubbing of Hartford.
We will definitely be following this story as it develops.
9 comments:
If the NCAA is even remotely consistent, then Kentucky won't have to forfeit anything. This exact same thing happened with Darrell Arthur and Kansas, and the NCAA determined that since there was no knowledge on the part of KU, they were in the clear. Same for UK.
Plus, if the NCAA penalized every athlete who received academic help in high school, they'd have to shut down college sports.
This whole thing is a non-story.
To piggyback my own point, here's an old Andy Katz quote from the NCAA on the Arthur situation:
"The NCAA told ESPN.com's Andy Katz that for Arthur to be ineligible, there would have to be evidence that Arthur or Kansas knew or should have known about the changed grade."
Again, barring a complete change by the NCAA, nothing at all will happen to UK.
So, If Kentucky knew nothing of the grade-altering, then we should assume that it is all the HS's fault? nobody pressured them into changing the grades? They figured out on their own that Bledsoe was gonna be a star and needed to have his grades changed?
This can't be a non-story. Yes, it's post-facto, but still, we can't just sweep this under the rug and say, "ehh Kentucky didn't know, and it happened a year ago, lets move on".
There is a teen/young adult out there making atleast 6-figures who couldn't legitimately pass Algebra-3.
What did Bledsoe get on his SATs? Did he even take them?
I for one think that if a player goes pro from college, then its discovered that he was ineligible, he should have to sit out of the NBA for a year. Bledsoe was admitted under false pretenses, and is now making 25x more than any UK student who enrolled AND graduated.
@WWHM - The more I read and think about the situation, the more I believe that you are correct. Like I said in the post, improved grades prove nothing other than improved academic effort.
That said, if the NCAA is able to prove that Bledsoe knowingly had his grades changed, they can rule him ineligible retroactively. That seems like it will be pretty difficult to accomplish, however. I guess that the investigation by the law firm comes out later this week (so says KSR) and my guess is that after we see that report, we'll know the likelihood of Bledsoe's eligibility being revoked.
Has Bledsoe come out and said anything on the matter?
If I busted my ass to raise my grades in one semester, I'd be pretty proud of myself. Proud enough to defend myself if somebody came out and said I cheated.
I know its suppose to be "innocent until proven guilty" but come on, do you really think he busted his ass, or do you just not want to pass judgement in fear of getting torched?
@Troy - Its all a matter of what can be proven by the NCAA. You're telling me that you don't think there is a legitimate chance that Bledsoe, knowing that his eligibility and potential for a professional career was on the line, buckled down and got the grades he needed? Do we even know for sure what the truth is with the grades being changed?
What do I think? I don't think anything happened here that doesn't routinely happen around the country.
@rob Yes, I don't think there is one iota of a chnace that Bledsoe buckled down. He would have come out an said he did.
Bledsoe's original grades were pretty suspect. It's a pretty big acconmplishment for someone like that when ur grades increase because of work ethic. For him to not have stood up and said anything makes me wonder.
My guess is that the reason Bledsoe hasn't said anything has to do with UK's official stance of not publicly commenting on the matter.
I'm sure Sandy Bell (UK's compliance director, and one of the best in the business) has discussed with Bledsoe the fact that any public statements could be used against him and the school.
Also, if he has any inclination to sue the NYT or any coaches for releasing his grades (which was a big no-no) he's likely getting legal advice to keep quiet.
Lastly, for anyone who doubts Thamel's motives, objectivity, or integrity, his piece last night in the NYT (referenced at KSR) should put any and all of those doubts to rest. I've seen an agenda like his.
^Should say I've *never* seen an agenda like his.
His vendetta against Cal and UK is sad and highly unprofessional.
Post a Comment